Throughout the accreditation period, follow-up verifies the continued fulfillment of the program’s quality conditions and monitors progress toward the commitments established in its Improvement Plan.
Follow-up is conducted through a cyclical approach of Plan → Do → Check → Improve, aimed at verifying compliance with established commitments and demonstrating the effectiveness, sustainability, and impact of the improvements implemented.
Commitments
Identify the observations, recommendations, and commitments that must be addressed throughout the accreditation period.
Implementation
Verify which planned actions have been completed, are in progress, or remain pending.
Indicators
Compare the results achieved against the established targets and indicators to determine the level of compliance.
Evidence
Confirm through objective documentation that the reported actions and improvements have been effectively implemented.
Results
Assess the effectiveness of the actions implemented, verifying that they generate measurable improvements in the program’s quality and performance.
Gaps
Identify unmet targets, delays, challenges, or emerging conditions that may affect fulfillment of the Improvement Plan.
Corrective Actions
Define corrective actions to address identified gaps, adjusting measures, responsibilities, resources, or timelines as necessary.
Report
Consolidate progress, indicators, evidence, results, gaps, and corrective actions into a traceable and verifiable report.
Feedback
Integrate the follow-up results into the next planning cycle, strengthening continuous improvement.